The Program That Wouldn't Stay Dead Is Finally Flatlined
Europe's Future Combat Air System (FCAS)—a sprawling, multibillion-euro effort to build a next-generation fighter jet across France, Germany, and Spain—appears to have entered its terminal phase. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's comments this week, stating bluntly that Berlin's military needs differ fundamentally from Paris's nuclear-armed, carrier-capable requirements, have prompted European defense officials to finally call what many have privately known for months: the program is effectively dead.
"SCAF is dead," Belgian Defense Minister Theo Francken posted on X, using the French acronym for the jet. "There will be no Franco-German sixth-generation fighter jet." Belgium had been an official observer, eyeing potential entry into the program—a position now under reassessment.
A Political Project on Life Support
The FCAS initiative, formally launched in 2017, represented an ambitious attempt at European industrial cooperation on a flagship defense program. The sixth-generation fighter was meant to be the centerpiece of a broader combat system that also included new weapons, autonomous drone wingmen, and a networked "combat cloud" communications architecture. For roughly a decade, FCAS symbolized European strategic ambition in advanced aerospace.
But beneath the political rhetoric lay irreconcilable industrial tensions. Germany's Airbus and France's Dassault Aviation have clashed repeatedly over program leadership and work-sharing arrangements. According to Paul Lever, former British ambassador to Germany, "Dassault wants a share of the work that is grossly disproportionate, and [CEO Eric Trappier] is unwilling to pass on secret information about the engineering aspects." The financial picture only worsened: costs ballooned, timelines slipped, and both nations' military requirements drifted further apart.
Merz's latest intervention is less a sudden death than a final acknowledgment. Paul Taylor, senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre think tank, compared the collapse to "a very slow motion strip tease." He noted that Franco-German political projects are notoriously difficult to kill outright—Europe will likely "let it go without a funeral," allowing other bilateral initiatives to supersede it quietly.
The Likely Endgame: Two Fighters Instead of One
Industry sources now openly discuss a restructured approach: abandoning the joint sixth-generation fighter in favor of two distinct national or bilateral programs. Germany and Spain—both industrially aligned with Airbus—could pursue one track, while France, leveraging Dassault's proven export success with the Rafale, moves forward independently. Such an arrangement would preserve some FCAS infrastructure, particularly the "combat cloud" network technology that both nations invested in.
France's position remains diplomatically muted. The Élysée Palace had not officially responded to Merz's comments at press time, a notable silence given that French President Emmanuel Macron had championed FCAS as a cornerstone of European strategic autonomy. However, France's focus may now pivot toward expanding Rafale exports—a deal for 114 aircraft to India is reportedly in final stages—making an independent path less economically painful.
What This Means for European Air Power
The collapse of FCAS creates immediate questions about European next-generation fighter strategy. The British-Japanese-Italian GCAP program now stands as Europe's primary competing next-gen effort, though skepticism remains about whether the continent can realistically support multiple sixth-generation fighter programs simultaneously. Belgium, having invested political capital as an observer, will now need to choose between GCAP, independent national solutions, or continued reliance on American F-35s.
What to watch: Whether Germany formally announces exit from the NGF portion of FCAS, and whether France accelerates Rafale domestic upgrades as Plan B. The symbolic end of a decade-long Franco-German aerospace partnership will reverberate across European defense planning for years.





