Latest by Segment
Air Force green-lights T-7 trainer jet for full production
The Next Generation of Pilot Training Takes Flight After more than two years of delays, the U.S. Air Force is poised to declare the Boeing T-7A Red Hawk trainer jet ready for full production within days, marking a critical inflection point for a program that has consumed enormous resources and weathered substantial technical and programmatic headwinds. The decision—formally known as Milestone C—represents the Air Force's confidence that the jet's design is mature enough to move from the experimental phase into sustained manufacturing at rates needed to replace the service's aging T-38 Talon trainers, which have been flying since 1961. Rodney Stevens, the Air Force's program executive officer for training, framed Milestone C as "monumental," telling Breaking Defense that the service is "confident in the design of the aircraft that we have, and that we're ready to start proving that we can produce the aircraft at rate." The Red Hawk will train the next generation of American fighter and bomber pilots—a mission critical to maintaining air superiority as peer competitors modernize their own pilot development pipelines. A Long Road to This Moment The T-7 program has been plagued by the kind of technical and managerial challenges that have become familiar in modern military aviation. Boeing, the prime contractor, faced design complexities involving the trainer's escape system and flight control software that prompted a scathing 2023 assessment from the Government Accountability Office. The program slipped more than two years past its original production timeline, a delay driven by both technical issues at Boeing and the Air Force's decision to shift to an "active management" strategy designed to reduce risk before full-rate production commenced. That strategy, championed by former Air Force acquisition chief Andrew Hunter and aligned with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's push to accelerate fielding timelines, prioritizes phased production lots and concurrent testing rather than waiting for perfect design maturity. It's a calculated bet: move forward with manufacturing while continuing development work in parallel, accepting some risk of design changes in exchange for getting capability to pilots faster. Stevens emphasized that this approach is being "very closely" managed with Air Education and Training Command (AETC) and Boeing. The Cost of Ambition Boeing's fixed-price contract on the T-7 has become the program's defining financial reality. The company has absorbed approximately $3.2 billion in cumulative losses—a staggering sum that underscores both the technical difficulty of the program and Boeing's commitment to seeing it through. Under the terms of the deal, Boeing must fix any "safety-critical items" discovered during testing or defects that prevent the trainer from meeting AETC's requirements at no additional cost. The Air Force has also dangled financial incentives tied to three major milestones: completing engineering and manufacturing development (EMD), achieving production readiness, and fielding the ground-based training system. Boeing has hit 17 of 19 targets to date. What Comes Next Two T-7A Red Hawks have already been delivered to Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas, where the 99th Flying Training Squadron became the first Air Force unit to receive the aircraft in January. One will be used for instructor familiarization; the other for maintainer training. An update planned for March will allow 99th pilots to begin flying and familiarizing themselves with the aircraft. Type 1 aircrew training will extend into early 2027, followed by initial operational test and evaluation in spring or summer 2027. The Air Force's target is initial operational capability—delivery of 14 training-ready aircraft—no later than November 2027, with the first generation of pilots beginning full training in 2028. Three additional aircraft are slated for delivery this year. Despite acknowledged risks from concurrent development and production, Stevens expressed confidence that the Red Hawk will match or exceed the T-38's performance while providing modern training capabilities that current-generation pilots desperately need.
Europe's Ramses Mission Will Chase Apophis Through Earth's Cosmic Backyard
Europe's Ramses Mission Will Chase Apophis Through Earth's Cosmic Backyard On February 10, 2026, the European Space Agency awarded OHB Italia a contract to build the Rapid Apophis Mission for Space Safety (Ramses)—a spacecraft designed to intercept and study the near-Earth asteroid 99942 Apophis as it makes one of the closest approaches to our planet in recorded history. Scheduled for launch in 2028, Ramses will arrive at Apophis in time to collect detailed scientific data during the asteroid's April 2029 flyby, when it will pass within 32,000 kilometers of Earth—closer than geostationary satellites and well inside the Moon's orbital distance. This is not a speculative mission. Apophis is a real asteroid, roughly 370 meters across, whose orbital mechanics and Earth-intersection have been precisely calculated. What makes Ramses historically significant is the opportunity it represents: a well-funded, internationally coordinated spacecraft will be present as a potentially hazardous object swings through our cosmic neighborhood. The data collected will fundamentally advance planetary defense science and asteroid characterization—knowledge that will be essential if humanity ever faces a genuine impact threat. Why Now, Why Apophis? Near-Earth objects like Apophis have been part of the astronomical landscape for billions of years, but only in the past two decades have space agencies begun treating close approaches as legitimate scientific opportunities rather than purely defensive scenarios. The 2029 Apophis flyby represents a rare convergence: an object large enough to study meaningfully, approaching close enough for detailed observation, with sufficient warning time to mount a proper mission. ESA's decision reflects a broader shift in planetary defense strategy. Rather than waiting for a crisis, space agencies are building the observational and technological capability to understand potentially hazardous asteroids in detail. Missions like Ramses generate data that informs impact probability calculations, material composition models, and theoretical deflection strategies. Japan's Hayabusa2 and NASA's OSIRIS-REx demonstrated the scientific payoff from close-range asteroid study; Ramses will extend that model to a dynamically significant object with a non-zero historical impact probability. Mission Design: Small Satellites, Big Science Ramses will deploy multiple CubeSats during the encounter, including one named "Farinella" in honor of the late Italian planetary scientist Paolo Farinella. These small satellites—some weighing as little as a few kilograms—will gather data from multiple vantage points, allowing scientists to construct a comprehensive picture of Apophis's physical properties: surface composition, internal structure, rotation dynamics, and gravitational field. JAXA's contributions include solar arrays and a thermal infrared imager, underscoring the mission's international scaffold. OHB Italia, with decades of heritage in complex space systems, leads the primary spacecraft development. This collaboration model—European prime contractor, Japanese subsystems, Italian CubeSat manufacturer—has become standard in planetary science and reflects both the distributed expertise across space-faring nations and the economic reality of cost-sharing for ambitious projects. What's at Stake Ramses launches in approximately two years. Success means a high-fidelity dataset on a near-Earth asteroid at closest approach—the kind of information that accelerates impact-risk modeling and validates deflection-strategy simulations. Failure means a missed window that won't recur for centuries. For the planetary defense community, the stakes are both scientific and existential.
NASA grows yogurt in space to feed Mars astronauts
Yogurt Becomes a Tool for Deep Space Survival NASA has transformed the International Space Station into an orbital biotechnology lab, running experiments that could fundamentally change how humans feed themselves on the way to Mars. The agency's BioNutrients-3 experiment is testing whether astronauts can produce nutrient-dense fermented foods—yogurt and similar products—using beneficial microorganisms in the microgravity environment. Samples are being returned to Earth aboard SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft on February 26, 2026, for analysis at NASA's Ames Research Center in California. The mission addresses one of the hardest problems in long-duration spaceflight: keeping astronauts healthy when resupply missions are months or years away. Certain vitamins and nutrients critical for human health degrade in storage or become impractical to transport on multi-year journeys. Rather than storing massive quantities of food and supplements launched from Earth, NASA is betting that astronauts can become their own food producers—growing nutrients on-demand through controlled fermentation. Why Fermentation Works in Space Fermented foods like yogurt are produced through microbial action, a biological process that doesn't inherently depend on gravity. The BioNutrients-3 experiment uses the same fundamental biochemistry that creates these foods on Earth, but with a critical difference: it's happening in microgravity, where resources are finite and resupply windows are measured in years rather than weeks. The strategic advantage is significant. A crew en route to Mars—facing a mission duration of 18 to 24 months or longer—cannot rely on regular resupply from Earth. Self-sufficiency isn't optional; it's existential. By engineering microorganisms to produce essential nutrients through fermentation, NASA could reduce the total mass that must be launched from Earth by orders of magnitude. This translates directly into faster transit times, lower mission costs, and increased safety margins for contingency situations. The work is part of NASA's broader Synthetic Biology project, funded by the agency's Game Changing Development program. This initiative explores redesigning organisms for specific purposes—in this case, creating vital nutrients tailored to the unique demands of long-duration spaceflight. Connecting to Artemis and Beyond These experiments are not isolated science exercises. They directly support NASA's Artemis campaign, which aims to return humans to the Moon and establish a sustainable presence there before launching crewed missions to Mars. The ability to produce food and medicines in space is a prerequisite for any long-duration deep space program. Without it, human Mars exploration remains theoretically possible but practically unsustainable. Historically, space agencies have relied on pre-packaged, shelf-stable food and periodic resupply missions. The International Space Station, orbiting 400 kilometers above Earth, receives cargo approximately every 90 days. A Mars mission would operate under completely different constraints: resupply windows would be separated by years, and the distance would make emergency resupply impossible. The shift from transport-dependent to production-based food systems represents a fundamental change in how humans can operate in space. What Comes Next Once the BioNutrients-3 samples return to Earth, NASA will analyze their nutritional composition, microbial viability, and safety profiles. The results will inform the design of future experiments and inform decisions about which fermentation systems might be integrated into spacecraft destined for the Moon and Mars. If successful, this work could enable the creation of closed-loop life support systems where food production becomes as routine as power generation or water recycling. The next phase will likely involve longer-duration experiments and testing with expanded microbial strains optimized for specific nutrient production in microgravity.
ISS Crew Restored After Rare Medical Emergency Forces Historic Evacuation
Four Astronauts Arrive at ISS Following January Medical Crisis The International Space Station welcomed four new crew members on February 14, 2026, restoring full operational capacity after a January medical emergency forced an unprecedented evacuation. The arrival of NASA astronauts Jessica Meir and Jack Hathaway, France's Sophie Adenot, and Russia's Andrei Fedyaev marks a critical milestone in stabilizing ongoing research operations aboard humanity's orbital laboratory. This crew rotation comes just weeks after NASA executed its first medical evacuation in the agency's 65-year history of crewed spaceflight—a sobering reminder that the ISS, despite decades of operational refinement, remains a high-risk environment where human health can deteriorate rapidly. In early January, one astronaut aboard the station developed a serious medical condition requiring immediate evacuation. Rather than attempt treatment in microgravity, mission control authorized the evacuation of that crew member plus three others, leaving the ISS temporarily staffed with only three astronauts and forcing the postponement of critical spacewalks and research activities. A Watershed Moment for Space Operations The January evacuation represents a pivotal inflection point in ISS operations. While medical emergencies have occurred during long-duration spaceflights before—Russian cosmonaut Valentin Lebedev famously suffered severe decompression sickness aboard Mir in 1989—this marks the first time NASA has had to execute a full crew evacuation response in its modern spaceflight era. The incident exposed vulnerabilities in the station's staffing model and prompted rapid reassessment of contingency protocols across all partner agencies: NASA, Roscosmos, ESA, and JAXA. Pre-flight medical screening, while rigorous, cannot predict all in-flight health complications. Long-duration microgravity exposure introduces physiological stressors—fluid shifts, bone density loss, cardiovascular deconditioning, and immune suppression—that compound over weeks and months. The incident underscores why the ISS operates on a 6-person minimum crew model and maintains strict rotation schedules. It also explains NASA's investment in rapid-turnaround crew launch systems like SpaceX's Crew Dragon, which can reach the station within 24 hours of launch. The New Team Brings Diverse Expertise The four arriving astronauts represent a constellation of specialization. Jessica Meir, making her second ISS flight, is a marine biologist who participated in the first all-female spacewalk in 2020 and has conducted extensive research on how microgravity affects living systems. Jack Hathaway, a U.S. Navy captain, brings command-level experience and leadership credentials essential during operations under stress. Sophie Adenot, France's second woman in space, is a military helicopter pilot whose aeronautical background adds critical systems expertise for maintaining the station's complex hardware. Andrei Fedyaev, a former Russian military pilot with prior ISS experience, provides continuity in Russian segment operations and redundancy in critical piloting and technical skills. This composition reflects the ISS's fundamental model: international cooperation where each agency contributes specialized talent. The station's complexity—with American, Russian, European, and Japanese modules operating under different protocols—demands crews with overlapping expertise and cross-training. What Comes Next The restored crew will immediately resume postponed research activities across biology, physics, materials science, and technology development. Spacewalks, which are among the station's highest-risk activities, will resume on a controlled schedule. Mission planners will continue analyzing the January evacuation to refine emergency protocols and ensure rapid crew rotation capabilities remain robust. The incident also likely accelerates development of on-orbit medical diagnostics and telemedicine capabilities to identify emergencies earlier and support treatment decisions in real time. For the broader spaceflight community, this moment reinforces a hard lesson: pushing deeper into space requires not just better technology, but better foresight about human vulnerability.
NASA races to fix Moon rocket before April launch window
Artemis II Hits the Repair Bay NASA's Artemis II lunar rocket and Orion spacecraft rolled into the Vehicle Assembly Building on February 25, and technicians immediately went to work on a helium system malfunction that emerged during a recent test firing. Engineers traced the problem to the rocket's interim cryogenic propulsion system (ICPS) — the upper stage responsible for pushing the spacecraft toward the Moon — narrowing suspects to either a quick-disconnect seal or a check valve on the helium supply line. The issue surfaced during a wet dress rehearsal on February 21, when engineers were reconfiguring the rocket following a successful test. The helium system failure meant the upper stage couldn't be properly pressurized and conditioned for flight, a critical prerequisite before any Moon mission can launch. With an April launch window already on the calendar, the clock is ticking — but NASA engineers insist the timeline remains achievable if repairs proceed cleanly. Why Helium Matters to Moon Missions To non-engineers, helium might sound like party balloon filler. In reality, it's mission-critical infrastructure. The ICPS uses helium to maintain proper internal environmental conditions and to pressurize the upper stage tank for flight. Without adequate helium flow and pressure, the stage cannot function reliably once in space. The system connects through two umbilical interfaces: a forward plate (smaller) carrying liquid hydrogen vent and environmental control lines, and an aft plate (larger) supplying both liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, plus the helium quick-disconnect that's now suspect. The repair scope extends beyond just the helium problem. Teams are installing two sets of internal access platforms inside the launch vehicle stage adapter and removing thermal blankets to reach the problematic connection points. It's painstaking work — the kind that requires careful choreography and zero tolerance for error. Parallel Work Maximizes Schedule Efficiency While technicians tackle the helium issue, other crews are executing complementary repairs in parallel. NASA engineers have optimized the Vehicle Assembly Building work schedule to install new batteries across the SLS core stage, upper stage, and solid rocket boosters. The team will also retest the flight termination system — the rocket's safety kill switches — alongside avionics and control systems verification. The Orion spacecraft's launch abort system batteries will be recharged, and crews may refresh stowed items in the crew module. This multi-workstream approach is standard practice for large-scale vehicle processing, but it only works if the primary repair — in this case, the helium system fix — doesn't cascade into secondary problems. NASA has budgeted flexibility into the timeline, but each discovered issue compounds schedule risk. The April Window and Beyond NASA has publicly committed to an April launch opportunity for Artemis II, pending successful completion of data reviews, repairs, and system retests. The rocket will need to roll back to Launch Pad 39B in time to meet that window. If repairs extend beyond a few weeks, or if the investigation uncovers additional issues with the ICPS, the launch could slip to later availability windows. The Artemis II mission represents a crucial stepping stone for the broader lunar program — a crewed test flight of the SLS and Orion before the actual Moon landing attempt. Any delay ripples through the entire architecture. Yet rushing repairs on a vehicle bound for human spaceflight is never the answer. NASA will move methodically through diagnostics and fixes. The real deadline isn't April; it's mission success.
SpaceX's Million-Satellite Plan Sparks Sky-Watching Showdown
The Proposal That's Dividing Space SpaceX is asking the Federal Communications Commission for permission to deploy one million satellites into Earth orbit—not for internet service, but to create what the company describes as orbital data centers powered by artificial intelligence. The filing, submitted in January 2026, represents an unprecedented scale of space ambition: a constellation roughly 100 times larger than all active satellites currently in orbit combined. If approved, it would transform Earth's orbital environment in ways scientists say could be irreversible. The proposal arrives at a critical moment for space governance. As commercial launch rates accelerate and mega-constellations become routine, regulators face a test case for whether environmental review processes can keep pace with industry ambition. The FCC's public comment period closes March 6, leaving a narrow window for scrutiny of a project that critics argue deserves far more. The Environmental Flashpoint DarkSky International, the leading organization fighting light pollution globally, has mobilized its 193,000 supporters to oppose the plan through formal FCC filings. Their core concern isn't technical—it's existential: "Once deployment begins at that scale, potentially involving thousands of launches each year, the effects on the night sky, orbital congestion, and the broader environment would be extraordinarily difficult to reverse." The risks DarkSky identifies are layered. First, visible light pollution: even with "brightness mitigation" measures like mirrors or black paint, research shows satellites interfere with astronomical observations, particularly those invisible to the naked eye. Second, space debris: one million operational units, multiplied by collision risk, could generate thousands of fragments that threaten other spacecraft. Third, launch frequency: maintaining a constellation of that scale would require thousands of rocket launches annually, each producing carbon emissions and atmospheric particulates. For a project supposedly designed to reduce Earth's energy footprint through solar-powered computing, the paradox is stark. The Case for Ambition SpaceX and its backers counter with a vision of genuine sustainability benefits. The company argues that orbital data centers powered by solar energy could significantly reduce global energy consumption by eliminating Earth-based server farms and their massive power demands. Supporters in public filings emphasize potential breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, global broadband connectivity to remote regions, and U.S. technological leadership. The economic argument carries weight: underserved populations lack reliable internet infrastructure, and this constellation could theoretically bridge that gap. For the technology sector, orbital computing represents the next frontier of innovation scaling. The Governance Question What troubles critics most isn't the vision itself—it's the process. DarkSky and allied organizations argue the FCC's expedited review doesn't allow sufficient environmental scrutiny. "Proposals of this magnitude warrant rigorous scrutiny, transparency, and meaningful public input before any approval is considered," the organization stated, calling for comprehensive long-term environmental studies before any deployment begins. The tension is real: regulatory caution can stifle innovation, but regulatory speed can lock in irreversible environmental damage. The space debris problem already taxes operators; one million additional objects would fundamentally alter orbital mechanics and collision probabilities. What's at Stake The FCC decision due after March 6 will likely set precedent for how aggressively the U.S. permits orbital expansion. If approved with minimal conditions, it signals that scale and economic benefit outweigh environmental risk. If denied or heavily conditioned, it establishes that space governance takes precedent over commercial timelines. Either way, this decision will echo through the next decade of space industry development.
China's Mars Sample Return Mission Threatens U.S. Leadership in Alien Life Hunt
The Rock That Changed Everything In July 2024, NASA's Perseverance rover discovered something that made planetary scientists collectively hold their breath: a Martian rock covered in peculiar markings—some resembling poppy seeds, others like leopard spots. On Earth, these biosignatures are almost exclusively produced by microbial life. While the discovery isn't definitive proof of ancient Martian biology, it represents humanity's best evidence yet that life might not be a cosmic anomaly. "If you do it, then human history is never the same," says Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at the Planetary Society. But there's a problem: those tantalizing rocks may never reach Earth. NASA's ambitious Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission—designed to retrieve pristine Martian samples for laboratory analysis—is effectively on life support. Congress has allocated zero funding for 2026, leaving the project with minimal backing and a clear path toward cancellation. After 50 years of preparation and billions invested, American planetary science finds itself two feet from the finish line with the gas running out. When American Leadership Meets Congressional Reality Mars Sample Return was conceived as a Rube Goldberg sequence of robotic missions: Perseverance would collect samples, hand them to a retrieval lander, which would launch them to orbit for Earth-bound transfer. It represented the crown jewel of U.S. Mars exploration and a logical stepping stone toward human missions. Yet the project fell victim to ballooning costs, technical complexity, and competing budgetary priorities. The timing couldn't be worse. While NASA struggles with funding uncertainty, China is moving "full steam ahead" with its own Mars sample return mission. The Chinese effort is leaner—and yes, the samples it retrieves will likely be lower quality—but it has something NASA currently lacks: momentum and committed resources. "At the rate we're going, there's a very good chance they'll do it before we do," laments Philip Christensen, a planetary scientist at Arizona State University. "Being there first is what matters." This isn't merely about scientific pride, though that stings. China establishing first contact with definitive evidence of extraterrestrial life would reshape geopolitical dynamics and scientific collaboration for decades. Beyond that, control over Mars sample analysis gives the first discoverer enormous leverage over future Martian research agendas. Why This Matters for Human Mars Missions Mars sample return isn't just about answering the 50-year-old Viking lander question about microbial life. It's a mandatory prerequisite for human Mars exploration. "If we can't do this, how do we think we're gonna send humans there and get back safely?" asks Victoria Hamilton, chair of the NASA-affiliated Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group. As fellow planetary scientist Paul Byrne puts it bluntly: "If you're going to bring humans back from Mars, you sure as shit have to figure out how to bring the samples back first." The technical challenges of sample retrieval—launching from the Martian surface, achieving Mars orbit rendezvous, and executing a pristine return trajectory to Earth—are precisely the systems NASA will need to master for crewed missions. Abandoning MSR doesn't just forfeit a scientific prize; it defers critical engineering development by years or decades. What's at Stake Mars remains an arid, radiation-scoured wasteland today. But billions of years ago, liquid water flowed across its surface under a protective magnetic field and thicker atmosphere. Beneath the modern surface, where shielded from cosmic radiation and warmer, microbial life might still persist. Sedimentary rocks—the type most likely to preserve fossils—require ground-based or robotic sampling. Martian meteorites that reach Earth are too damaged by radiation and atmospheric friction to yield reliable data. The scientific opportunity is genuine and narrow. Congress has a choice: fund the final act of a decades-long investigation, or watch another nation write the epilogue to humanity's greatest existential question. History suggests the world remembers who got there first.
NASA's 42-Year Quest to Measure Earth's Energy Balance Pays Off
Four Decades of Watching the Planet's Energy Checkbook NASA has spent the last 42 years obsessively measuring something most people never think about: how much energy the Sun sends to Earth and how much our planet bounces back into space. The payoff? A continuous, global accounting of Earth's radiation budget—the critical gap between incoming solar energy and outgoing thermal radiation—that has fundamentally shaped climate science and improved weather forecasting at a scale that affects billions of lives. The work, anchored by NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, represents one of the most sustained and rigorous observational science efforts in the space age. Today, it remains the only program globally producing comprehensive Earth radiation budget data, making it an irreplaceable cornerstone of climate science infrastructure. From Explorer 1 to CERES: A Timeline of Seeing the Invisible The journey began long before modern climate consciousness. NASA's Explorer 1, launched in January 1958, orbited Earth over 58,000 times before burning up in the atmosphere—a brief but scientifically prophetic mission. By 1975, NASA deployed the Nimbus satellite, which achieved the first global, direct observations of solar radiation entering and exiting Earth's atmosphere. These early measurements helped validate the first generation of climate models and proved that tracking Earth's energy balance was not just scientifically possible but essential. The real inflection point came in October 1984, when the Space Shuttle Challenger launched the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (ERBS) carrying the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) instruments. Retired ERBE scientist Bruce Barkstrom recalled the launch with visceral clarity: the shuttle's exhaust was so luminous it lit the pre-dawn sky from beneath clouds, then reflected off those same clouds minutes later as the sun crested the horizon. The image captures why this work matters—we're tracking the planet's most fundamental energy flows, and occasionally, we see them with our own eyes. ERBE operated for a decade, delivering unprecedented regional and global measurements of how clouds, ice, and the atmosphere itself regulate Earth's radiative balance. In the late 1980s, these satellites produced the first direct evidence that clouds—counterintuitively—cool the planet overall, a finding that revolutionized climate modeling. By 1997, ERBE's successor, the Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES), launched aboard the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission and has since flown on seven satellites across multiple space agencies, including NASA and NOAA partnerships. Why This Matters: The Science Behind the Data Understanding Earth's energy budget isn't an academic exercise. The delicate equilibrium between incoming solar radiation and outgoing thermal energy determines whether Earth warms or cools. Decades of continuous, stable, and accurate measurements—the kind only satellite networks can provide—feed into climate models and seasonal forecasts that inform policy makers and industry planners worldwide. The technology has evolved dramatically. CERES instruments are described by Principal Investigator Kory Priestley as "probably the most accurate radiometry that NASA has flown." The latest addition, the Total and Spectral Solar Irradiance Sensor (TSIS)-1 aboard the International Space Station, measures the Sun's energy input with unprecedented precision, helping scientists isolate the Sun's natural influence on atmospheric circulation, clouds, and ozone from human-driven climate signals. What's Next: The Never-Ending Search The seventh and final CERES instrument activated in January 2018, representing the end of a generation. NASA Langley's team is already developing next-generation instruments to maintain the continuity this irreplaceable 42-year dataset demands. As Barkstrom reflected, "With Earth observations, you never complete your understanding." In observational science, absolute certainty is impossible—and that's precisely why we keep watching.
NASA Just Made Moonlight into Breathable Air
The News NASA's Carbothermal Reduction Demonstration (CaRD) project has cleared a critical hurdle: successfully extracting oxygen from simulated lunar regolith using nothing but concentrated sunlight. The integrated prototype test, conducted aboard the International Space Station, confirmed that solar-driven chemistry can produce carbon monoxide from lunar soil—the essential first step toward generating breathable air for astronauts living on the Moon. This isn't theoretical anymore. It's hardware that works. Why This Matters Right Now The challenge facing long-duration lunar missions is brutally simple: you can't ship enough oxygen from Earth. Resupply missions are expensive, infrequent, and add massive weight to launch vehicles. For NASA's Artemis program to establish a sustainable lunar base—a cornerstone of the Moon-to-Mars architecture—the agency needs to generate life support resources on-site rather than hauling them across 240,000 miles of vacuum. CaRD solves this by turning lunar geology into life support. The Moon's regolith, the pulverized rock covering its surface, is approximately 45% oxygen by mass, locked inside silicate minerals. The catch: extracting it requires intense heat. CaRD uses a solar concentrator—essentially a sophisticated mirror array—to focus sunlight into a reactor hot enough to drive carbothermal reduction, the same chemistry used on Earth to refine metals from ore. The Technical Achievement The CaRD prototype integrates four major components: a carbothermal oxygen production reactor built by Sierra Space, a solar concentrator designed by NASA Glenn Research Center, precision mirrors from Composite Mirror Applications, and avionics and gas analysis systems from Kennedy Space Center. Johnson Space Center pulled the systems engineering together. During testing, they confirmed production of carbon monoxide (CO) from the regolith simulant—proof that the concept works in controlled conditions. The real power lies downstream: when CO is converted into O₂ using additional chemical processes already in development, the system could produce a steady oxygen supply for habitat life support, fuel cell operations, or even metallurgical processes. Why carbothermal reduction specifically? It's proven industrial chemistry, scalable, and—critically—it requires no chemical inputs that aren't already abundant on the Moon. Sunlight is the only external resource needed. What Comes Next The immediate path forward involves coupling this oxygen extraction with conversion technology to turn CO into usable O₂. Beyond the lunar south pole, NASA is already eyeing how to adapt CaRD for Mars, where the technology could extract oxygen from Martian regolith or even convert atmospheric CO₂ into propellant. The cost and logistics savings are staggering: reducing payload mass for human missions, decreasing launch frequency, and enabling crews to live off the land rather than Earth's supply chain. CaRD was funded by NASA's Game Changing Development program under the Space Technology Mission Directorate—signaling this is no longer moonshot research, but mainstream development. As Artemis missions ramp up in the coming years, technologies like this transition from "demonstration" to "flight hardware." The Moon just became a lot more hospitable.
Lost Soviet Scientist Proves the Sun Rules Your Body
The Forgotten Prophet of Solar Biology In 1924, a Russian scientist named Alexander Chizhevsky made a claim so audacious that it would haunt him for the rest of his life: the Sun doesn't just warm the Earth—it synchronizes human biology, behavior, and even history itself. Almost a century later, modern research is proving he was onto something profound. Chizhevsky (1897–1964) was a polymath in an era when that term still meant something. He was a poet, inventor, and natural philosopher who noticed patterns others had missed. While studying historical records of major wars, revolutions, and social upheavals, he observed something striking: they clustered during periods of intense solar activity. He published his findings in "Physical Factors of the Historical Process" (1924) and later expanded his theory in works like "The Terrestrial Echo of Solar Storms" (1936). His thesis was revolutionary and controversial: the Sun's 11-year activity cycle left an imprint on human civilization itself. A Career Derailed by an Idea Too Big Chizhevsky's misfortune was timing and geography. Working in Stalin's Soviet Union, he became a victim of ideological purges that viewed his work as pseudoscience. Despite his extraordinary contributions to electrobiology and atmospheric ionization research, he spent years in exile and was largely written out of scientific history in the West. For decades, heliobiology—the study of solar influences on biological systems—became a whispered field, relegated to the fringes of respectable science. But science has a long memory. By the 1990s, researchers building on Chizhevsky's foundational work began documenting measurable links between solar activity and human physiology. Studies showed correlations between solar storms and variations in heart rate variability, blood pressure, and even immune function. The connections weren't magical; they were physical—solar activity drives changes in Earth's magnetosphere and cosmic ray flux, which influence electrical properties in living organisms. His intuition had been scientifically sound all along. Modern Validation: The Science Catches Up Today, Chizhevsky is recognized as the undisputed pioneer of heliobiology. Academic works like "Solar Activity & The Biosphere: Heliobiology. From A.L. Chizhevsky To The Present" (edited by Boris M. Vladimirsky and colleagues, 1999) explicitly trace the field's genealogy back to him, cataloging over 500 peer-reviewed papers that validate his core insights. Researchers have confirmed that geomagnetic storms correlate with measurable changes in human circadian rhythms, hemodynamics, and neurological function. Solar cycles influence everything from birth rates to mood disorders to hospital admissions for specific conditions. The irony is delicious: a man persecuted for ideas that seemed too strange to be true spent his final decades vindicated by the very scientific method his critics invoked to dismiss him. The Next Frontier: Personal Heliobiology Chizhevsky's legacy is about to enter the personal health space in a tangible way. Perihelion is developing Heliobios, an iOS app launching soon (with Android to follow) that bridges the gap between solar data and individual biometrics. The app integrates directly with Apple HealthKit and Oura ring data at launch, allowing users to track correlations between solar activity and their own physiological responses—heart rate variability, sleep quality, stress levels, and more. Additional integrations are planned as the platform matures. Heliobios represents the democratization of a field Chizhevsky pioneered alone: giving individuals the tools to understand their own solar biology. Visit Heliobios.com to learn more and sign up for launch notifications. Chizhevsky would have marveled at the idea. The Sun, he believed, was not a distant furnace but a fundamental organizing principle of life itself. Now, finally, the data is catching up to his vision.
NASA's Twin Spacecraft Will Map Mars' Atmospheric Death
NASA's Twin Spacecraft Will Map Mars' Atmospheric Death NASA's ESCAPADE mission has switched on its science instruments, marking the first operational phase of an unprecedented dual-spacecraft venture to understand how the Sun systematically stripped Mars of its once-habitable atmosphere. Launched November 13, 2025, aboard a Blue Origin New Glenn rocket, the two orbiters are currently looping around Lagrange Point 2—a gravitational waystation 1 million miles from Earth—before executing a gravity-assisted maneuver off our planet in November 2026 to reach Mars in September 2027. The mission arrives at a critical moment for Mars exploration. While robotic rovers have mapped the planet's surface for decades, ESCAPADE represents the first coordinated two-spacecraft investigation of Mars' magnetosphere and the solar wind processes that have transformed the Red Planet from a warm, wet world into a frozen desert over billions of years. "Having two spacecraft is going to help us understand cause and effect," said Michele Cash, ESCAPADE program scientist at NASA Headquarters. This stereo perspective—simultaneous measurements from two vantage points—will reveal how the solar wind interacts with Mars' magnetic field and drives atmospheric escape in real time. Why Mars Lost Its Atmosphere (And Why That Matters for Human Missions) Mars once possessed a dense atmosphere and a robust global magnetic field capable of deflecting the Sun's relentless particle stream. Today, the Red Planet's magnetosphere is a patchwork: remnants of ancient crustal magnetism combined with a weaker, induced field generated by solar wind interactions with charged particles in the upper atmosphere. This "hybrid" magnetosphere provides minimal protection against solar radiation—a critical liability for future human explorers. Understanding this process isn't merely academic. Before NASA sends astronauts to Mars, engineers must quantify radiation exposure on the surface and develop shielding protocols for habitats. ESCAPADE will also characterize Mars' ionosphere, the electrically charged upper atmosphere layer that future missions will rely on for radio communications and navigation systems. "If we ever want GPS at Mars or long-distance communications, we need to understand the ionosphere," said Rob Lillis, the mission's principal investigator at UC Berkeley. A New Approach to Mars Trajectory ESCADADE showcases a paradigm shift in deep-space mission planning. Traditional Mars launches required Earth-Mars orbital alignment—a constraint that restricted launch windows to every 26 months. By adopting a "loiter" orbit around Lagrange Point 2, ESCAPADE decouples launch timing from planetary mechanics, enabling missions to depart Earth almost on demand. During this extended loop, the twin spacecraft will traverse an unexplored region of Earth's distant magnetotail, approximately 1.2 million miles from our planet, collecting the first direct measurements of this region's plasma and magnetic field properties. Technical Innovation: Stereo Magnetosphere Monitoring Once in Mars orbit, ESCAPADE's dual-spacecraft architecture enables groundbreaking measurements. For the mission's first six months, the orbiters will follow identical orbital paths, passing over the same magnetic features at different times. This configuration allows detection of magnetosphere variations on timescales as short as two minutes—previously impossible with single-spacecraft missions. After six months, one spacecraft will climb to higher altitude while the other remains closer to Mars, enabling simultaneous upstream solar wind measurements and magnetosphere monitoring. "Prior spacecraft could either be in the upstream solar wind, or they could be close to the planet," Lillis noted. "ESCAPADE allows us to be in two places at once and measure the cause and the effect." What's Next The spacecraft will arrive at Mars in September 2027, initiating a multi-year science campaign timed to inform NASA's Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate planning for crewed missions. ESCAPADE's data will directly feed into radiation protection standards, landing site selection, and life support system requirements for Mars exploration. The mission's success could validate the Lagrange Point loiter trajectory as a standard approach for future deep-space missions, fundamentally reshaping how NASA schedules interplanetary exploration.
Explore full coverage by segment
Live Space Weather Data
Real-time monitoring from NOAA SWPC, satellite feeds, and orbital tracking
View Live Dashboard